Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Applied Mathematics, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran.

Abstract

In recent years, management and, consequently, supply chain performance measurement, has attracted the attention of a large number of managers and researchers in the field of production and operations management. In parallel with the evolution of organizations from a single approach to a network and supply chain approach, performance measurement systems have also changed and moved towards network and supply chain performance measurement. Therefore, in order to face the storm of great change and transformation and not give in to the wave of competitive aggression, organizations have long had one thing in common, and that is to focus approaches and focus efforts towards achieving results. Results that lead to a competitive advantage and are more effective and decisive in the performance indicators of the organization, including earning more. In this study, in order to identify and prioritize the factors affecting the supply chain in manufacturing companies, using indicators such as cost, timely delivery and procurement time to evaluate the supply chain efficiency is considered. And performance evaluation was performed at the manufacturer level. Therefore, in order to evaluate the performance of the supply chain using the AHP integration approach and the DEA method approach in the fuzzy environment, the suppliers and suppliers of the manufacturing company were evaluated and ranked in terms of performance.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1]       Asgharizadeh, E., Momeni, M., & Ghasemi, A. (2010). Development of supply chain performance indicators by modeling the European model of quality management (case study: shahrvand chain stores company). Journal of transformation management, 2(3), 68-98.
[2]       Morgan, Ch. (2007). Supply network performance measurement: future challenges? The international journal of logistics management, 18 (2), 255-273.
[3]       Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & Tirtiroglu, E. E. (2004). Performance measures and METRICS in a supply chain environment. International journal of operations & production management, 21 (1/2), 71-87.
[4]       Wen, M., You, C., & Kang, R. (2010). A new ranking method to fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Computers & mathematics with applications59(11), 3398-3404.
[5]       Burgess, K., Singh, P. J., & Koroglu, R. (2006). Supply chain management: a structured literature review and implications for future research. International journal of operations & production management, 26(7), 703-729.
[6]       Hedayat Tabatabai, S. A. (2012). Measuring productivity with a technical and engineering approach. Defense Industries Educational and Research Institute.
[7]       Kadkhodazadeh, H. R., & Morvati Sharifabadi, A. (2013). Supplier selection using fuzzy inference system. Production and operations management, 7 (2), 113-132.
[8]       Wen, M., You, C., & Kang, R. (2014). A new ranking method to fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Computers and mathematics with application, 59, 3398-3404.
[9]       Lee, C., & Wen-Jung, C. (2005). The effects of internal marketing and organizational culture on knowledge management in the information technology industry. International journal of management22(4), 661.
[10]   Estampe, D., Lamouri, S., Paris, J. L., & Brahim-Djelloul, S. (2013). A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models. International journal of production economics142(2), 247-258.
[11]   Thomas, D. J., & Griffin, P. M. (1996). Coordinated supply chain management. European journal of operational research94(1), 1-15.
[12]   Lee, H. L., & Billington, C. (1992). Managing supply chain inventory: pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan management review33(3), 65-73.
[13]   Wu, D., & Olson, D. L. (2008). Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection. International journal of production economics114(2), 646-655.
[14]   Wu, D., & Olson, D. L. (2008). Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection. International journal of production economics114(2), 646-655.
[15]   Xu, J., Li, B., & Wu, D. (2009). Rough data envelopment analysis and its application to supply chain performance evaluation. International journal of production economics122(2), 628-638.
[16]   Saleh, H., & Shafiee, M. (2017). Performance evaluation using three-level data envelopment analysis. Paper presented at the first national conference on modern applied research in basic sciences. Bandar Abbas, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas Branch.
[17]   Koushki, F., & Mashayekhi Nezamabadi, E., (2018). A network data envelopment analysis method for evaluating supply chains and its application in pharmacy. Engineering and quality management, 8(1), 48-37.
[18]   Mousavi, S.M., & Ahmadzadeh, N. (2018). Evaluation and evaluation of supply chain efficiency using data envelopment analysis (case study: Amol paper companies). 7th national conference on accounting and management applications. Tehran, Asia Gold Communication Group.
[19]   Hosseinzadeh Seljuqi, F., & Rahimi, A. (2016). Evaluation of efficiency and efficiency at the scale of supply chain of Iranian resin industries with definitive and fuzzy data envelopment analysis model. Production and operations management, 10(1) (18 consecutive), 63-47.
[20]   Samoilenko, U. (2013). Aligning supply chain collaboration using analytic hierarchy process. Omega, 41(2), 431-440.
[21]   Singh, S., & Aggarwal, R. (2014). DEAHP Approach for manpower performance evaluation. Journal of the operations research society of China, 2(3), 317-332.
[22]   Comelli, M., Fenie, P., & Tchernev, N. (2016). A combined financial and physical flows evaluation for logistic process and tactical production planning: Application in a company supply chain. International journal of production economics, 112, 77–95.
[23]   lim, j. j., & zhang, a. n. (2016). A dea approach for supplier selection with AHP and risk consideration. 2016 IEEE international conference on big data (Big Data). IEEE. 3749-3758.
[24]   Liang, L., Yang, F., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2017). DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Annals of operations research, 145, 35–49.
[25]   Chan, F. T. S. (2017). Performance measurement in a supply chain. International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 21, 534–548.
[26]   Easton, L., Murphy, D. J., & Pearson, J. N. (2018). Purchasing performance evaluation: with data envelopment analysis. European journal of purchasing & supply management, 8, 123–134.
[27]   Lim, J. J., & Zhang, A. N. (2016, December). A DEA approach for Supplier Selection with AHP and risk consideration. 2016 IEEE international conference on big data (big data) (pp. 3749-3758). IEEE.
[28]   Lim, J. J., & Zhang, A. N. (2016, December). A DEA approach for supplier selection with AHP and risk consideration. 2016 IEEE international conference on big data (big data) (pp. 3749-3758). IEEE.