Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications

Quarterly Publication

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Open Access Policy

Editorial Staff

Related Links

Journal Forms

Journal Metrics

Financial Policies

Crossmark Policy

Complaints

News

FAQ

Open Special Issues

Propose a Special Issue

Publication Ethics

Journal Policies

Editorial Board

Peer Review Policies

Guide for Reviewers

Reviewers (2022)

Reviewers (2021)

Reviewers (2020)

Join Us As Reviewer

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

Detection of counterfeit banknotes using genetic fuzzy system

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Computer Engineering, Sirnak University, Turkey.

Abstract

Due to developments in printing technology, the number of counterfeit banknotes is increasing every year. Finding an effective method to detect counterfeit banknotes is an important task in business. Finding a reliable method to detect counterfeit banknotes is a crucial challenge in the world of economic transactions. Due to technological development, counterfeit banknotes may pass through the counterfeit banknote detection system based on physical and chemical properties undetected. In this study, an intelligent counterfeit banknote detection system based on a Genetic Fuzzy System (GFS) is proposed to detect counterfeit banknotes efficiently. GFS is a hybrid system that uses a network architecture to fine-tune the membership functions of a fuzzy inference system. The learning algorithms Fuzzy Classification, Genetic Fuzzy Classification, ANFIS Classification, and Genetic ANFIS Classification were applied to the dataset in the UCI machine learning repository to detect the authenticity of banknotes. The developed model was evaluated based on Accuracy (ACC), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Error Mean, Error STD, and confusion matrix. The experimental results and statistical analysis showed that the classification performance of the proposed model was evaluated as follows: Fuzzy = 97.64%, GA_Fuzzy = 98.60%, ANFIS = 80.83%, GA_ANFIS = 97.72% accuracy (ACC). This shows the significant potential of the proposed GFS models for fraud detection.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
  1. Lundblad, L. J., Vedin, L., & Bjorkman, C. (2015). S. Patent No. 8,942,461. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  2. Lee, S. H., & Lee, H. Y. (2018). Counterfeit bill detection algorithm using deep learning. International journal of applied engineering research, 13(1), 304-310. https://www.ripublication.com/ijaer18/ijaerv13n1_42.pdf
  3. Kasie, F. M., & Bright, G. (2021). Integrating fuzzy case-based reasoning, parametric and feature-based cost estimation methods for machining process. Journal of modelling in management, 16(3), 825–847. DOI: 1108/JM2-05-2020-0123/FULL/HTML
  4. Al-Gawda, M., Beiji, Z., & Mohammed, N. (2016). Yemeni mobile counterfeit detection system using support vector machines, fuzzy logic and image processing techniques. Journal of computational and theoretical nanoscience, 13(5), 2965-2977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2016.4945
  5. Pham, T. D., Lee, D. E., & Park, K. R. (2017). Multi-national banknote classification based on visible-light line sensor and convolutional neural network. Sensors, 17(7), 1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17071595
  6. Takeda, F., Sakoobunthu, L., & Satou, H. (2003). Thai banknote recognition using neural network and continues learning by DSP unit. International conference on knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems(pp. 1169-1177). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45224-9_158
  7. Youn, S., Choi, E., Baek, Y., & Lee, C. (2015). Efficient multi-currency classification of CIS banknotes. Neurocomputing, 156, 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.01.014
  8. Yan, W. Q., Chambers, J., & Garhwal, A. (2015). An empirical approach for currency identification. Multimedia tools and applications, 74(13), 4723-4733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1833-x
  9. Zhang, E. H., Jiang, B., Duan, J. H., & Bian, Z. Z. (2003). Research on paper currency recognition by neural networks. Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on machine learning and cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No. 03EX693)(Vol. 4, pp. 2193-2197). IEEE. DOI: 1109/ICMLC.2003.1259870
  10. Cao, B. Q., & Liu, J. X. (2010). Currency recognition modeling research based on BP neural network improved by gene algorithm. 2010 second international conference on computer modeling and simulation(Vol. 2, pp. 246-250). IEEE. DOI: 1109/ICCMS.2010.270
  11. Al-Gawda, M., Beiji, Z., & Mohammed, N. (2016). Yemeni mobile counterfeit detection system using support vector machines, fuzzy logic and image processing techniques. Journal of computational and theoretical nanoscience, 13(5), 2965-2977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2016.4945
  12. Alnowaini, G., Alabsi, A., & Ali, H. (2019). Yemeni paper currency detection system. 2019 first international conference of intelligent computing and engineering (ICOICE)(pp. 1-7). IEEE. DOI: 1109/ICOICE48418.2019.9035192
  13. Lee, J. W., Hong, H. G., Kim, K. W., & Park, K. R. (2017). A survey on banknote recognition methods by various sensors. Sensors, 17(2), 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17020313
  14. Frosini, A., Gori, M., & Priami, P. (1996). A neural network-based model for paper currency recognition and verification. IEEE transactions on neural networks, 7(6), 1482-1490. DOI:1109/72.548175
  15. Yeh, C. Y., Su, W. P., & Lee, S. J. (2011). Employing multiple-kernel support vector machines for counterfeit banknote recognition. Applied soft computing, 11(1), 1439-1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2010.04.015
  16. Takeda, F., Nishikage, T., & Omatu, S. (1999). Banknote recognition by means of optimized masks, neural networks and genetic algorithms. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence, 12(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-1976(98)00061-X
  17. Kaburlasos, V. G., & Kehagias, A. (2013). Fuzzy inference system (FIS) extensions based on the lattice theory. IEEE transactions on fuzzy systems, 22(3), 531-546. DOI:1109/TFUZZ.2013.2263807
  18. Basturk, A., Basturk, N. S., Degbedzui, D. K., & Yuksel, M. E. (2021). Efficient detection of counterfeit banknotes using adaptive network based fuzzy inference systems. 2021 13th international conference on electrical and electronics engineering (ELECO)(pp. 575-579). IEEE. DOI: 23919/ELECO54474.2021.9677736
  19. Rashidpour, M., Abdali-Mohammadi, F., & Fathi, A. (2016). Fall detection using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system.  J. Multimed. Ubiquitous Eng, 11, 91-106. https://gvpress.com/journals/IJMUE/vol11_no4/10.pdf
  20. Chhabra, A., Kim, D., & Cohen, K. (2020). Enhanced cascaded genetic fuzzy system for counterfeit banknote detection. North american fuzzy information processing society annual conference(pp. 277-287). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81561-5_23
  21. Forrest, S. (1996). Genetic algorithms. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 28(1), 77-80. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/234313.234350
  22. Arnett, T., Ernest, N., Kunkel, B., & Boronat, H. (2020). Formal verification of a genetic fuzzy system for unmanned aerial vehicle navigation and target capture in a safety corridor. North american fuzzy information processing society annual conference(pp. 361-372). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81561-5_30
  23. Ernest, N., Cohen, K., Kivelevitch, E., Schumacher, C., & Casbeer, D. (2015). Genetic fuzzy trees and their application towards autonomous training and control of a squadron of unmanned combat aerial vehicles. Unmanned systems, 3(03), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2301385015500120
  24. Buckles, B. P., Petry, F. E., Prabhu, D., George, R., & Srikanth, R. (1994). Fuzzy clustering with genetic search. Proceedings of the first IEEE conference on evolutionary computation. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence(pp. 46-50). IEEE. DOI: 1109/ICEC.1994.350044
  25. Carse, B., Fogarty, T. C., & Munro, A. (1996). Evolving fuzzy rule based controllers using genetic algorithms. Fuzzy sets and systems, 80(3), 273-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00196-4
  26. Cordón, O., Herrera, F., Gomide, F., Hoffmann, F., & Magdalena, L. (2001). Ten years of genetic fuzzy systems: current framework and new trends. Proceedings joint 9th IFSA world congress and 20th NAFIPS international conference (Cat. No. 01TH8569)(Vol. 3, pp. 1241-1246). IEEE. DOI: 1109/NAFIPS.2001.943725
  27. Cordón, O., Herrera, F., Hoffmann, F., & Magdalena, L. (2001). Genetic fuzzy systems. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/4177
  28. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/banknote+authentication
  29. Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
  30. Taylor, E. (1994). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. complex adaptive systems. John H. Holland. The quarterly review of biology, 69(1), 88-89.
  31. Heiss-Czedik, D. (1997). An introduction to genetic algorithms. Artificial life, 3(1), 63-65.
  32. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
  33. Jang, J. S. (1993). ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 23(3), 665-685. DOI:1109/21.256541
  34. Armaghani, D. J., & Asteris, P. G. (2021). A comparative study of ANN and ANFIS models for the prediction of cement-based mortar materials compressive strength. Neural computing and applications, 33(9), 4501-4532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05244-4
  35. Milan, S. G., Roozbahani, A., Azar, N. A., & Javadi, S. (2021). Development of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system–Evolutionary algorithms hybrid models (ANFIS-EA) for prediction of optimal groundwater exploitation. Journal of hydrology, 598, 126258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126258
  36. Kardani, N., Bardhan, A., Kim, D., Samui, P., & Zhou, A. (2021). Modelling the energy performance of residential buildings using advanced computational frameworks based on RVM, GMDH, ANFIS-BBO and ANFIS-IPSO. Journal of building engineering, 35, 102105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102105
  37. Dirik, M. (2022). Prediction of NOx emissions from gas turbines of a combined cycle power plant using an ANFIS model optimized by GA. Fuel, 321, 124037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124037
  38. Siddique, N. (2014). Intelligent control: a hybrid approach based on fuzzy logic, neural networks and genetic algorithms (Vol. 517). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02135-5
  39. Ahmad, F., Mat Isa, N. A., Hussain, Z., Osman, M. K., & Sulaiman, S. N. (2015). A GA-based feature selection and parameter optimization of an ANN in diagnosing breast cancer. Pattern analysis and applications, 18(4), 861-870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-014-0375-9
  40. Harandizadeh, H., & Armaghani, D. J. (2021). Prediction of air-overpressure induced by blasting using an ANFIS-PNN model optimized by GA. Applied soft computing, 99, 106904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106904
  41. Martínez-Soto, R., Castillo, O., & Aguilar, L. T. (2014). Type-1 and Type-2 fuzzy logic controller design using a Hybrid PSO–GA optimization method. Information sciences, 285, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.07.012
  42. Le, L. T., Nguyen, H., Dou, J., & Zhou, J. (2019). A comparative study of PSO-ANN, GA-ANN, ICA-ANN, and ABC-ANN in estimating the heating load of buildings’ energy efficiency for smart city planning. Applied sciences, 9(13), 2630. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9132630
  43. Kardani, N., Bardhan, A., Kim, D., Samui, P., & Zhou, A. (2021). Modelling the energy performance of residential buildings using advanced computational frameworks based on RVM, GMDH, ANFIS-BBO and ANFIS-IPSO. Journal of building engineering, 35, 102105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102105
  44. Zanganeh, M. (2020). Improvement of the ANFIS-based wave predictor models by the particle swarm optimization. Journal of ocean engineering and science, 5(1), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2019.09.002
  45. Basser, H., Karami, H., Shamshirband, S., Akib, S., Amirmojahedi, M., Ahmad, R., ... & Javidnia, H. (2015). Hybrid ANFIS–PSO approach for predicting optimum parameters of a protective spur dike. Applied soft computing, 30, 642-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.02.011
  46. Mostafaei, M., Javadikia, H., & Naderloo, L. (2016). Modeling the effects of ultrasound power and reactor dimension on the biodiesel production yield: comparison of prediction abilities between response surface methodology (RSM) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Energy, 115, 626-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.028
  47. Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J., & Jurman, G. (2021). The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ computer science, 7, e623. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.623
  48. Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R. (2014). Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?–arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific model development, 7(3), 1247-1250. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014, 2014
  49. Biau, D. J. (2011). In brief: standard deviation and standard error. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 469, 2661–2664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1908-9
  50. Mostafaei, M. (2018). ANFIS models for prediction of biodiesel fuels cetane number using desirability function. Fuel, 216, 665-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.025
  51. Makhtar, M., Neagu, D. C., & Ridley, M. J. (2011). Comparing multi-class classifiers: on the similarity of confusion matrices for predictive toxicology applications. International conference on intelligent data engineering and automated learning(pp. 252-261). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23878-9_31
  52. Catal, C. (2012). Performance evaluation metrics for software fault prediction studies. Acta polytechnica hungarica, 9(4), 193-206.
Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications
Volume 3, Issue 4
October 2022
Pages 302-312
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics