Document Type : Research Paper


Department of Mathematics, Research Scholar, Nirmala College for Women, Coimbatore, India.


In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute decision making problems with spherical fuzzy information. The advantage of spherical fuzzy set is easily reflecting the ambiguous nature of subjective judgments because the spherical fuzzy sets are suitable for capturing imprecise, uncertain and inconsistent information in the multiple attribute decision making analysis. Thus, the cross- entropy of spherical fuzzy sets called, spherical fuzzy cross-entropy, is proposed as an extension of the cross-entropy of fuzzy sets. Then, a multiple attribute decision making method based on the proposed spherical fuzzy cross entropy is established in which attribute values for alternatives are spherical fuzzy numbers. In decision making process, we utilize the spherical fuzzy weighted cross entropy between the ideal alternative and an alternative to rank the alternatives corresponding to the cross entropy values and to select the most desirable one(s). Finally, a practical example for enterprise resource planning system selection is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.


Main Subjects

  1. Antonov, I. (1995). On a new geometrical interpretation of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Notes on Intuitionistic fuzzy sets1(1), 29-31.
  2. De Luca, A., & Termini, S. (1972). A definition of a nonprobabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy sets theory. Information and control20(4), 301-312.
  3. Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., & Kahraman, C. (2019). Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems36(1), 337-352.
  4. Gong, Z., Xu, X., Yang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, H. (2016). The spherical distance for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in decision analysis. Technological and economic development of economy22(3), 393-415.
  5. Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951). On information and sufficiency. The annals of mathematical statistics22(1), 79-86.
  6. Lin, J. (1991). Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE transactions on information theory37(1), 145-151.
  7. Shang, X. G., & Jiang, W. S. (1997). A note on fuzzy information measures. Pattern recognition letters18(5), 425-432.
  8. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The bell system technical journal27(3), 379-423.  
  9. Vlachos, I. K., & Sergiadis, G. D. (2007). Intuitionistic fuzzy information–applications to pattern recognition. Pattern recognition letters28(2), 197-206.
  10. Xia, M., & Xu, Z. (2012). Entropy/cross entropy-based group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Information fusion13(1), 31-47.
  11. Yang, Y., & Chiclana, F. (2009). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: spherical representation and distances. International journal of intelligent systems24(4), 399-420.
  12. Ye, J. (2009). Fault diagnosis of turbine based on fuzzy cross entropy of vague sets. Expert systems with applications36(4), 8103-8106.
  13. Ye, J. (2009, August). Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on the intuitionistic fuzzy cross-entropy. 2009 international conference on intelligent human-machine systems and cybernetics(Vol. 1, pp. 59-61). IEEE.
  14. Ye, J. (2011). Fuzzy cross entropy of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its optimal decision-making method based on the weights of alternatives. Expert systems with applications38(5), 6179-6183.
  15. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information control, 8, 338–353.
  16. Zadeh, L. A. (1968). Probability measures of fuzzy events. Journal of mathematical analysis and applications, 23, 421–427.
  17. Zhang, Q. S., & Jiang, S. Y. (2008). A note on information entropy measures for vague sets and its applications. Information sciences178(21), 4184-4191.
  18. Zhang, Q., & Jiang, S. (2010). Relationships between entropy and similarity measure of interval‐valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International journal of intelligent systems25(11), 1121-1140.