Document Type : Research Paper


1 Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

3 Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.


Examining the trend of the global economy shows that global trade is moving towards high-tech products. Given that these products generate very high added value, countries that can produce and export these products will have high growth in the industrial sector. The importance of investing in advanced technologies for economic and social growth and development is so great that it is mentioned as one of the strong levers to achieve development. It should be noted that the policy of developing advanced technologies requires consideration of various performance aspects, risks and future risks in the investment phase. Risk related to high-tech investment projects has a meaning other than financial concepts only. In recent years, researchers have focused on identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing risk. There are two important components in measuring investment risk in high-tech industries, which include identifying the characteristics and criteria for measuring system risk and how to measure them. This study tries to evaluate and rank the investment risks in advanced industries using fuzzy TOPSIS technique based on verbal variables.


Main Subjects

  1. Mousakhani, M., Saghafi, F., Hasanzadeh, M., & Sadeghi, M. E. (2020). Proposing dynamic model of functional interactions of iot technological innovation system by using system dynamics and fuzzy DEMATEL. Journal of operational research and its applications, 17(4), 1-21.
  2. Fallah, M., Sadeghi, M. E., & Nozari, H. (2021). Quantitative analysis of the applied parts of Internet of Things technology in Iran: an opportunity for economic leapfrogging through technological development. Science and technology policy Letters. (In Persian).
  3. Mousakhani, M., Saghafi, F., Hasanzade, M., & Sadeghi, M. E. (2020). Presenting a policy framework for high technologies, using Identification of factors affecting the development of a technological innovation system with meta-synthesis. Journal of decisions and operations research, 5(1), 13-27. (In Persian). DOI: 22105/dmor.2020.221888.1138
  4. Elyasi, M., Mohammadi, M., Baharloo, M., Khosropour, H., & Taheri, Z. (2021). Developing a knowledge management`s framework for identification of success factors in the product acquisition cycles - case of aviation industries organization. International journal of innovation in engineering, 1(1) 76-100.
  5. Shin, J. C., Li, X., Byun, B.-K., & Nam, I. (2020). Building a coordination system of HRD, research and industry for knowledge and technology-driven economic development in South Asia. International journal of educational development, 74, 102161. DOI: 1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102161
  6. Brown, M. M., Bryan, R., & Conley, J. (1999). Database protection in a digital world. Richmond journal of law and technology, 6(1).
  7. Ganda, F. (2019). The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. Journal of cleaner production, 217, 469-483.
  8. Choudry, S. A., Sandmann, S., & Landgrebe, D. (2018). A methodical approach for an economic assessment of joining technologies under risk – optimized decision-making in automobile body development. Procedia CIRP, 69, 31-36.
  9. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Hu, D., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Government R&D subsidies, information asymmetry, and the role of foreign investors: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment on the shanghai-hong kong stock connect. Technological forecasting and social change, 158, 120162.
  10. Cooper, R. G. (2019). The drivers of success in new-product development. Industrial marketing management, 76, 36-47.
  11. Nartea, G. V., Bai, H., & Wu, J. (2020). Investor sentiment and the economic policy uncertainty premium. Pacific-Basin finance journal, 64, 101438.
  12. Joshi, K. (2018). Managing the risks from high-tech Investments in India: differential strategies of foreign and domestic venture capital firms. Journal of global entrepreneurship research, 8(1), 21. DOI: 1186/s40497-018-0106-6
  13. Liu, P., Zhang, X., & Liu, W. (2011). A risk evaluation method for the high-tech project investment based on uncertain linguistic variables. Technological forecasting and social change, 78(1), 40-50.
  14. Park, W., & Maillie, J. (1982). Strategic analysis for venture evaluations: the save approach to business decisions. New York Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  15. Tyebjee, T. T., & Bruno, A. V. (1984). A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management science, 30(9), 1051-1066. DOI: 1287/mnsc.
  16. Fried, V. H., & Hisrich, R. D. (1994). Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. Financial management, 23(3), 28-37. DOI: 2307/3665619
  17. Manigart, S., Wright, M., Robbie, K., Desbrières, P., & De Waele, K. (1997). Venture capitalists’ appraisal of investment projects: an empirical european study. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 21(4), 29-43. DOI: 1177/104225879702100403
  18. Chotigeat, T., Pandey, I. M., & Kim, D. (1997). Venture capital evaluation in emerging markets. Multinational business review, 5, 54-62.
  19. Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2003). Financial contracting theory meets the real world: an empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. The review of economic studies, 70(2), 281-315.
  20. Zutshi, R. K., Tan, W. L., Allampalli, D. G., & Gibbons, P. (1999). Singapore Venture Capitalists (VCs) investment evaluation criteria: a re-examination. Small business economics, 13(1), 9-26.
  21. Han, J. X., & Ma, L. (2001). Analysis and measurement of venture of investment into high technology projects.  Harbin Inst. Technol3(7), 300-303.
  22. Shan, X. L., & Sun, Q. B. (2008). Risk analysis and evaluation on investment in high-new-tech project. Journal of university of science and technology liaoning5, 014.
  23. Um, K.-H., & Kim, S.-M. (2018). Collaboration and opportunism as mediators of the relationship between NPD project uncertainty and NPD project performance. International journal of project management, 36(4), 659-672.
  24. Fanousse, R. I., Nakandala, D., & Lan, Y.-C. (2021). Reducing uncertainties in innovation projects through intra-organisational collaboration: a systematic literature review. International journal of managing projects in business, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). DOI: 1108/IJMPB-11-2020-0347
  25. Wengao, L. (2005). Comprehensive evaluation model for the investing risk of using artificial neural network in the hi-tech projects. Technology and innovation management26(3), 8-11.
  26. Tang, W., Zhang, F., Ye, Z., & Li, J. (2011). Research on risk evaluation in urban rail transit project. Procedia engineering, 15, 5094-5099.
  27. Zhao, H., & Li, N. (2015). Risk evaluation of a UHV power transmission construction project based on a cloud model and FCE method for sustainability. Sustainability, 7(3), 2885-2914.
  28. Wang, L., Peng, J.-j., & Wang, J.-q. (2018). A multi-criteria decision-making framework for risk ranking of energy performance contracting project under picture fuzzy environment. Journal of cleaner production, 191, 105-118.
  29. Wu, Y., Zhang, T., Chen, K., & Yi, L. (2020). A risk assessment framework of seawater pumped hydro storage project in China under three typical public-private partnership management modes. Journal of energy storage, 32, 101753.
  30. Baylan, E. B. (2020). A novel project risk assessment method development via AHP-TOPSIS hybrid algorithm. Emerging science journal, 4(5), 390-410.
  31. Dehgan Tezerjani, H., Ramazani Khorshid Doost, R., & Khajezadeh Dezfoli, M. (2021). Investigating Iran Housing market cycles and possible scenarios in short-term and midterm horizon using the system dynamics. International journal of innovation in engineering, 1(1), 120-133.
  32. Shirazi, F. (2021). Managing portfolio’s risk for improving quality in a project oriented manufacture. International journal of innovation in engineering, 1(1), 55-63.
  33. Sadeghi, M. E., & Sadabadi, A. A. (2015). Evaluating science parks capacity to create competitive advantages: comparison of pardis technology park and sheikh bahaei science and technology park in Iran. International journal of innovation and technology management, 12(06), 1550031.
  34. Kaviani, M., Fakhrehosseini, S. (2020). Application of fuzzy logic in portfolio management: evidence from Iranian researches. Journal of fuzzy extension and applications, 1(2), 115-118.
  35. Sagnak, M., Berberoglu, Y., Memis, İ., & Yazgan, O. (2021). Sustainable collection center location selection in emerging economy for electronic waste with fuzzy Best-Worst and fuzzy TOPSIS. Waste management, 127, 37-47.
  36. Nozari, H., Sadeghi, M. E., Eskandari, J., & Ghorbani, E. (2012). Using integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to explore the impact of knowledge management tools in staff empowerment (Case study in knowledge-based companies located on science and technology parks in Iran). International journal of information, business and management, 4(2), 75-92.
  37. Sadeghi, M. E., Khodabakhsh, M., Ganjipoor, M. R., Kazemipoor, H., & Nozari, H. (2021). A new multi objective mathematical model for relief distribution location at natural disaster response phase. International journal of innovation in engineering, 1(1), 29-54.
  38. Solangi, Y. A., Longsheng, C., & Shah, S. A. A. (2021). Assessing and overcoming the renewable energy barriers for sustainable development in Pakistan: An integrated AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Renewable energy, 173, 209-222.
  39. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making(pp. 58-191). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  40. Varatharajulu, M., Duraiselvam, M., Kumar, M. B., Jayaprakash, G., & Baskar, N. (In Press). Multi criteria decision making through TOPSIS and COPRAS on drilling parameters of magnesium AZ91. Journal of magnesium and alloys.
  41. Yu, D., & Pan, T. (2021). Tracing knowledge diffusion of TOPSIS: A historical perspective from citation network. Expert systems with applications, 168, 114238.
  42. Aliahmadi, A., Sadeghi, M. E., Nozari, H., Jafari-Eskandari, M., & Najafi, S. E. (2015). Studying key factors to creating competitive advantage in science park. Proceedings of the ninth international conference on management science and engineering management(pp. 977-987). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  43. Mathew, M., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Ryan, M. J. (2020). A novel approach integrating AHP and TOPSIS under spherical fuzzy sets for advanced manufacturing system selection. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence, 96, 103988.
  44. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353.
  45. Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information sciences, 8(3), 199-249.
  46. Alkan, N., & Kahraman, C. (2021). Evaluation of government strategies against COVID-19 pandemic using q-rung orthopair fuzzy TOPSIS method. Applied soft computing, 110, 107653.
  47. Salih, M. M., Zaidan, B. B., Zaidan, A. A., & Ahmed, M. A. (2019). Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the-art between 2007 and 2017. Computers & operations research, 104, 207-227.
  48. Rajak, M., & Shaw, K. (2019). Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Technology in society, 59, 101186.
  49. Marzouk, M., & Sabbah, M. (2021). AHP-TOPSIS social sustainability approach for selecting supplier in construction supply chain. Cleaner environmental systems, 2, 100034.
  50. Jafar, M., Khan, F., Naveed, A. (2020). Prediction of Pakistan super league-2020 using TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Journal of fuzzy extension and applications, 1(2), 104-114.
  51. Khodadadi-Karimvand, M., & Shirouyehzad, H. (2021). Well drilling fuzzy risk assessment using fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of fuzzy extension and application2(2), 144-155.