Document Type : Research Paper


Industrial Engineering Department, Gaziantep University, 27100, Gaziantep, Turkey.


It has become one of the indispensable conditions to continuously improve the quality and achieve the quality standards in order to adapt to the increasingly competitive environment in the textile industry. However, the textile production process like many other industrial processes involves the interaction of a large number of variables. For a standard quality production, the relation between raw material properties, process parameters, and environmental factors must be established conclusively. The physical properties of air textured warp yarn that affect the quality of the yarn, construct the strength of the yarn. After the production process, different values of each yarn sample are revealed from the strength tests performed during the quality control process. Six criteria that affect the quality of the yarn and identify the strength of the yarn are defined as a result of strength tests. Those criteria are count, tenacity, elongation shrinkage, Resistance per Kilometer (RKM) and breaking force. The differences between the values of these criteria and linguistic variables cause uncertainty when defining the quality of the yarn. To take into consideration this uncertainty a Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) is developed using six criteria as inputs, 144 rules created, and the linguistic variables of Air Textured Yarn (ATY) samples of a textile manufacturer. The quality level of the products according to the different membership functions are identified with the proposed FIS generated by MATLAB version 2015a and recommendations are made to the manufacturer.


Main Subjects

  1. Afroz, F., & Siddika, A. (2014). Effect of warp yarn tension on crimp% in woven fabric. European scientific journal (ESJ)10(24).
  2. Sreenivasamurthy, H. V., & Purushothama, B. (2018). Texturising: defects, causes, effects, remedies and prevention through quality management. WPI Publishing.
  3. Majumdar, A., Majumdar, P. K., & Sarkar, B. (2005). Application of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy system for the prediction of cotton yarn strength from HVI fibre properties. Journal of the textile institute96(1), 55-60.
  4. Majumdar, A., & Ghosh, A. (2008). Yarn strength modelling using fuzzy expert system. Journal of engineered fibers and fabrics3(4).
  5. Malik, Z. A., & Malik, M. H. (2010). Predicting strength tranfer efficiency of warp and weft yarns in woven fabrics using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Indian journal of fibre & textile research, 35, 310-316.
  6. Amindoust, A., & Saghafinia, A. (2017). Textile supplier selection in sustainable supply chain using a modular fuzzy inference system model. The journal of the textile institute108(7), 1250-1258.
  7. Vu, C. C., & Kim, J. (2018). Human motion recognition using SWCNT textile sensor and fuzzy inference system based smart wearable. Sensors and actuators A: physical283, 263-272.
  8. Sarkar, J., Mondal, M. S., & Khalil, E. (2020). Predicting fabric GSM and crease recovery angle of laser engraved denim by fuzzy logic analysis. Journal of engineering and applied science, 4, 52-64.
  9. Metwally, M. H., Hassan, M. M., & Hassaan, G. A. (2019, September). Mechanical machinery faults detection and classification based on artificial intelligence techniques. 2019 10th IEEE international conference on intelligent data acquisition and advanced computing systems: technology and applications (IDAACS)(pp. 882-888). IEEE.
  10. Alavi, N. (2013). Quality determination of Mozafati dates using Mamdani fuzzy inference system. Journal of the Saudi society of agricultural sciences12(2), 137-142.
  11. Jahantigh, F. F., Noroozian, A., & Daneshi, A. (2018). Using the knowledge base and fuzzy inference system to estimate the safety factor in calculating the number of the kanban cards. International journal of industrial and systems engineering28(2), 275-287.